<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vala and unit testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/</link>
	<description>Ideas for free software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 23:11:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daeng Bo</title>
		<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator>Daeng Bo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 06:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asabil.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-405</guid>
		<description>Ali,
I am a big proponent of Vala (especially as it approaches 1.0 and Gnome is looking toward 3.0). I&#039;m also a long-time follower of the Soylent project, and recently stumbled upon People (That&#039;s your project, isn&#039;t it?).

I&#039;d love to interview you about it to help spread the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ali,<br />
I am a big proponent of Vala (especially as it approaches 1.0 and Gnome is looking toward 3.0). I&#8217;m also a long-time follower of the Soylent project, and recently stumbled upon People (That&#8217;s your project, isn&#8217;t it?).</p>
<p>I&#8217;d love to interview you about it to help spread the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hans Baier</title>
		<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Baier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 15:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asabil.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-400</guid>
		<description>Is it already available in git?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it already available in git?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ali Sabil</title>
		<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/#comment-382</link>
		<dc:creator>Ali Sabil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asabil.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-382</guid>
		<description>I agree with you, but the current implementation uses the glib testing framework: GTest, which is imho far less than optimal, I will see what I will be able to do in the next days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you, but the current implementation uses the glib testing framework: GTest, which is imho far less than optimal, I will see what I will be able to do in the next days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gantenbein</title>
		<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/#comment-381</link>
		<dc:creator>gantenbein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asabil.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-381</guid>
		<description>The standard output on failure should be something like:

Expected: ... But was: ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The standard output on failure should be something like:</p>
<p>Expected: &#8230; But was: &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gantenbein</title>
		<link>http://asabil.wordpress.com/2009/01/23/vala-and-unit-testing/#comment-380</link>
		<dc:creator>gantenbein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:23:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://asabil.wordpress.com/?p=43#comment-380</guid>
		<description>Great!

I would like to see more assert_* functions as in JUnit. E.g. for comparing floats/doubles within a delta or for checking the equality of arrays, and with the ability to specify a message to be printed on failure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great!</p>
<p>I would like to see more assert_* functions as in JUnit. E.g. for comparing floats/doubles within a delta or for checking the equality of arrays, and with the ability to specify a message to be printed on failure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
